Documentation Contents

JAXP Compatibility Guide for Java SE 6 Platform

Contents

Introduction

The Java Platform, Standard Edition 1.4 (Java SE 1.4) included the Crimson reference implementation for JAXP 1.1. The Java platform, Standard Edition 6 (Java SE 6) includes a reference implementation for JAXP 1.4 based on the Apache Xerces library.

Because these implementations come from entirely different codebases, and because the JAXP standard has evolved from 1.1 to 1.4, there are some subtle differences between the implementations, even they both conform to the JAXP standard. These two factors combine to create the compatibility issues described in this guide.

What's New

See Release Notes.

DOM Level 3

While the reference implementation in Java SE 1.4 supported the DOM Level 2 API, the implementation in Java SE 6 supports the DOM Level 3 family of APIs. This section covers the impact of those changes on programs that used the JAXP 1.1 reference implementation:

For more information, see the complete list of changes in the DOM Level 3 Changes appendix.

Methods added to DOM interfaces

In DOM level 3, additional methods were defined in the following interfaces:

The added methods only affect applications that implement the interfaces directly, and only when the application is recompiled. Applications that use the factory methods to obtain implementation classes for these interfaces will have no problems.

Preserving the XML format

These changes affect an application that reads in XML data into a DOM, makes modifications, and then writes it out in a way that preserves the original formatting.

In JAXP 1.1, extraneous whitespace was automatically removed on input, and a single property (ignoringLexicalInfo) was set to false to preserve entity nodes and CDATA nodes, for example. Including the additional nodes made the DOM somewhat more complex to process, but because they were there, adding whitespace output (indentation and newlines) produced highly readable, formatted version of the XML data which closely approximated the input.

In JAXP 1.4, there are four APIs that the application uses to determine how much lexical (formatting) information is available to process, using the following DocumentBuilderFactory methods:

The default values for all of these properties is false, which preserves all the lexical information necessary to reconstruct the incoming document in its original form. Setting them all to true lets you construct the simplest possible DOM, so the application can focus on the data's semantic content, without having to worry about lexical syntax details.

Note: When adding new nodes, the application must add any indentation and newline formatting that is needed for readability, since it is not provided automatically.

SAX 2.0.2

Following are the changes made between SAX 2.0.0 and SAX 2.0.2 that might affect compatibility.

Note: One point of compatibility is also worth mentioning. Namespace recognition was turned off by default in Java SE 1.4 (JAXP 1.1). For backward compatibility, that policy is continued in Java SE 6 (JAXP 1.4). However, namespace recognition is turned on by default in the official SAX implementation at https://sourceforge.net/projects/sax/. While not strictly a compatibility issue from the standpoint of JAXP, it is an issue that sometimes comes as a surprise.

Invoking XSLT

Code that uses the standard JAXP APIs to create and access an XSL transformer does not need to be changed. The output will be the same, but will in general be produced much faster, since the XSLTC compiling transformer will be used by default, instead of the interpreting Xalan transformer.

Note: There may be no significant difference between Xalan and XSLTC performance for a single run on a small data set, as when you are developing and testing an XSL stylesheet. But there is a major performance benefit when using XSLTC on anything larger.

Programmatic Access to Xalan XPath

JAXP 1.4 provides the standard XPath API for evaluating XPath expressions. We encourage users to use this API. Xalan-interpretive is not included in the reference implementation. If an application explicitly uses the Xalan XPath API to evaluate a standalone XPath expression (one that is not part of an XSLT stylesheet), you'll need to download and install the Apache libraries for Xalan.

Package Name Changes

This change does not affect applications that confine themselves to using the standard JAXP APIs. But applications that access implementation-specific features of the XML processors defined in JAXP versions prior to 1.3 will have to be modified.

The change has several effects on previous applications:

  1. The property-values that were used to access the internal implementations must be changed.
  2. Applications that used internal APIs that from the Xalan implementation classes must change the import statements that gave them access to those APIs.
  3. Applications that used internal APIs from the Crimson implementation must be re-coded – ideally, by using newer JAXP APIs or, if necessary, by using Xerces APIs.

What Changed, and Why

In Java SE 1.4, the fact that JAXP was built into the Java platform was a mixed blessing. On the one hand, an application could rely on that fact that it was there. On the other, most applications needed features and bug fixes that were available in later versions.

But adding new libraries had no effect, because internal classes always take precedence over the classpath. The solution for that problem in 1.4 was to use the endorsed standards mechanism. However, that was a new mechanism, and one which frequently placed an additional burden on the end user, as well as the application developer.

The solution since JAXP 1.3 is to change the package names of the Apache libraries used in the implementation. That change lets a user reference newer Apache libraries in the classpath, so application developers can use them in the same way that would use any other additions to the Java platform.

The new names given to the Apache packages in the JAXP 1.3 reference implementation are shown below:

Changes in JAXP package names

JAXP 1.1

Since JAXP 1.3

org.apache.crimson

-/-
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal

org.apache.xml

com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal

Changes in XSLT package names

JAXP 1.1

Since JAXP 1.3

org.apache.xalan
org.apache.xpath
org.apache.xalan.xsltc

com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal
com.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc

Security Issue Posed by Nested Entity Definitions

While XML does not allow recursive entity definitions, it does permit nested entity definitions, which produces the potential for Denial of Service attacks on a server which accepts XML data from external sources. For example, a SOAP document like the following that has very deeply nested entity definitions can consume 100% of CPU time and large amounts of memory in entity expansions:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding ="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE foobar[
  <!ENTITY x100 "foobar">
  <!ENTITY  x99 "&x100;&x100;">
  <!ENTITY  x98 "&x99;&x99;">
  ...
  <!ENTITY   x2 "&x3;&x3;">
  <!ENTITY   x1 "&x2;&x2;">
]>

<SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV=...>
  <SOAP-ENV:Body>
    <ns1:aaa xmlns:ns1="urn:aaa" SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="...">
      <foobar xsi:type="xsd:string">&x1;</foobar>
    </ns1:aaa>
  </SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>

A system that doesn't take in external XML data need not be concerned with the issue, but one that does can utilize one of the following safeguards to prevent the problem:


Oracle and/or its affiliates Copyright © 1993, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Contact Us